It's been a minute, so let's just call this the first intallment of "off the dome." Off the dome is a series of quick opines on topics in the news. Reading time: 15 minutes. Here we go:
CIVIL WAR OR NOT A CIVL WAR
It's been a civil war for a while, people. Anytime you have ethnic-based abductions, torture, murder, suicide bombings, ritual executions and general mayhem, you are in the midst of civil war. Perhaps our government has been avoiding the tough questions associated with quelling a civil war. They cannot avoid them any longer.
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT
I do not think Barack Obama should run for president. I don't think Barack Obama should run for vice president. I DO think Barack Obama should concentrate on enacting good policies, learning all he can in the Senate, build relationships among fellow Senators and Representatives so that he will win easy re-election. Obama needs to do the type of heavy lifting behind the scenes that will legitmize himself as one of the true Democratic heavyweights in two years. He needs to avoid the "do nothing to do little" label slapped on Carol Moseley Braun. Remember her? One-termer from the great state of Illinois.
HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT
There's no doubt she'll run and she definitely has the political seasoning for it. The problem is, can she tap into that all-things-to-all-people style of oratory for which Bill is famous? An inspired Hillary is only slightly less dull than a John Kerry speech. And who would her campaign manager be? Her running mate? I can just see the GOP attack ads now, declaring that a vote for Hillary is really just a third term for Bill and does America really need more Bill Clinton? Can Hillary not be overshadowed by the sniping and attacking that will be more focused on her husband and the Lewinsky penis-washing episodes or the fact that most white, non-college graduate stay-at-home Moms hate her guts? Can she counter the belief among the evangelicals that not only is she stepping in front of her husband, but also that she doesn't relate to their beliefs and definition of womanhood?
If she gets the Dems nomination, her ability to succeed depends on her choice of running mate and whom she would be running against on the GOP ticket. The X-factor is this and it remains a sad commentary on the true state of our country: is there a white, male running mate who could truly stand and stomach the put-downs of being on the Democratic ticket with a female presidential candidate? John Edwards? No. John Kerry? Hell, no. Al Gore? Don't think so. Evan Bayh? Nope. The sorry state of our country is that a large section of it is no more willing to accept a strong female presidential candidate than they are willing to accept a Black one. Sad but true. But the true low point will be the stupid, Cro-Magnonesque put-downs about the top two Democratic powers being women. You already see how Pelosi is being portrayed. Amplify that by 100 and you might be at the start of what Hillary faces.
What do I think she should do? Make Bill Richardson her running mate. He's smart. Talented. Been in Congress. UN Ambassador. Energy Secretary. DNC Chair. New Mexico governor. And he's Hispanic. So if you're Hillary, you convince Donna Brasille to come out of political retirement and run your campaign. You make Bill Richardson your running mate and (if he doesn't run) you get Al Gore on your team and you formulate the environment and what we've done to it to be a legitimate front-line campaign issue for the first time in years. (BTW, next Off the Dome, I'll look at the GOP candidates)
THE N-WORD: USE IT OR LOSE IT?
I say lose it. First off, any single word that can boil Black people's blood to the point they are ready to reject reason and violently attack a non-Black person who hurls it at them is a word that carries power. Words do that. Words have history. I think the rationale that I can call my fellow brotha the "N-word" but then a white guy can't, just as ridiculous as white conservative think tanks using Civil Rights laws to attack reverse discrimination against white people. It's hypocrisy. The Civil Rights laws were put in place to give Black people (and all people of color) ACCESS to opportunities denied them. Let me restate: ACCESS. That does not mean free jobs, free education or free money. You still have to earn the pay check, get good grades and manage your opportunities well. The Civil Rights laws were NOT put in place for already well-to-do white folks to use it as a basis to get richer and make college even more elite. Just the same, the "N-word" cannot be reconfigured, re-claimed, flipped or re-worked to become ANYTHING positive as it relates to Black people. Unless Black people summarily get selective amnesia, the world will ALWAYS conjure a time where we were defined as less than human and treated worse than animals. You can flip the spelling however you want, but our history of the word has and will always be negative. Therefore, use of the word in general but by Black people specifically, is a fresh, philosophical lyching of millions of Blacks who died at the hands of those who embraced the word's true meaning.
THE BCS
It really stands for Best Crowd Scenario. First off, anyone who doesn't think the Bowl system, OR March Madness for that matter isn't about money is deluding themselves. When you are talking sports, you are talking our house or theirs. Come into our place and beat us or we go into your place and beat you. Any neutral site anything is just an excuse to make money. That's how you pick Nebraska to go to the Cotton Bowl over a team that BEAT them, finished with just as many wins, but one fewer loss (Texas). Yeah, Austin isn't too far away from Dallas, but you know literally thousands of 'Huskers fans are going to load up the RVs, drive to Dallas and paint the town green while cheering on their Big Red. All bowl games are just excuses for alumni to gather, party, have a good time, make business deals and be solicited by corporate sponsorships at game-related events. That's all it is. Power conferences get most of the nods and then the schools share tens of millions of dollars on top of the millions they get from TV deals. If you are a student athlete, I hope you get your degree, because universities are using those players like rented mules to make billions. I say give me a playoff system. Now, why will that never happen? Re-read this graf.
WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE A FULL PULLOUT FROM THE PERSIAN GULF
Because we set up a puppet government in Iraq (you can create whatever type of government you want, just make sure its Democratic with a legal system not based on the Qua'ran) Since we've already done a great job actually increasing the terror threat, how about we have some straight talk with Turkey, India, Russia, the entire EU and Saudi Arabia. The speech? Get involved now to help clean up (our) mess or throw in your chips for a nuclear World War III within 5-10 years. If we completely pull out, the Shia from Iran tip the balance of Iraq to gain control. They then increase the influnce in the region, emboldening Syria and Lebanon. Israel is now at risk as is India from a destabilized Afghanistan and Pakistan. Separatists in the Muslim former Soviet-controlled countries are too emboldened. Saudi Arabia with its distorted haves and have nots existence gets called out for embracing Western ideals and suddenly, its piplelines become terror targets. Iran goes nuclear and either Syria or Lebanon hits Israel hard. In typical fashion, Israel responds like a sledgehammer. Nuclear volleys are exchanged. Welcome to WWIII folks.
Labels: Barack, BCS, Clinton, Hillary, musings, n-word, Obama, politics